Investors Portal
Short-Term Rentals vs. Hotels

Short-Term Rentals vs. Hotels: Where Should Investors Place Their Bets?

The real estate investment landscape has never been more diverse. Investors now have access to everything from multifamily housing to healthcare facilities and retail spaces. Two of the most debated options today are short-term rentals (STRs) like those offered on Airbnb and Vrbo and traditional hotels. Both asset classes can be profitable, but they come with different levels of risk, management intensity, and scalability.

At Qila Capital, we specialize in repositioning underperforming hotels into profitable assets. Many investors ask us whether they should diversify into short-term rentals or double down on hotels. The answer depends on their goals, risk tolerance, and desire for long-term stability.

This blog explores the pros and cons of each option to help investors make informed decisions.

1. The Rise of Short-Term Rentals

Short-term rentals have exploded in popularity over the last decade. Platforms like Airbnb have created a global marketplace for unique stays, giving travelers flexible options outside of traditional hotels.

  • Market Growth: STRs have grown rapidly in urban and resort destinations.
  • Traveler Appeal: Guests enjoy “home-like” accommodations, kitchens, and more space for families.
  • Low Barrier to Entry: Many individuals started with single properties, creating a flood of supply.

For investors, STRs initially appeared to offer high cash flow potential with minimal upfront costs.

2. The Enduring Strength of Hotels

Hotels remain the cornerstone of the hospitality industry. Despite the rise of STRs, hotels continue to dominate the market because of:

  • Brand Trust: Marriott, Hilton, and Hyatt maintain strong reputations for quality and safety.
  • Operational Consistency: Guests expect standardized service across locations.
  • Business and Event Demand: Conferences, weddings, and corporate travel continue to drive occupancy.

Hotels provide a proven, structured investment model with clear performance benchmarks like RevPAR (Revenue per Available Room). To learn more, see our blog on Hotel vs. Multifamily Investments.

3. Revenue Potential Comparison

Short-Term Rentals:

  • Can yield high nightly rates in tourist-heavy markets.
  • Peak seasons drive significant revenue surges.
  • However, occupancy can be unpredictable, and income fluctuates based on seasonality.

Hotels:

  • Generate consistent revenue through multiple demand segments: leisure, corporate, and group travel.
  • Higher average occupancy due to brand loyalty and marketing power.
  • Additional revenue streams: restaurants, bars, spas, and event spaces.

Investor Takeaway: STRs may outperform in select markets short-term, but hotels provide diversified revenue sources and long-term consistency. See why accredited investors prefer hotel syndications.

4. Operating Costs and Management

Short-Term Rentals:

  • Often self-managed or handled by property managers charging 15–30% of revenue.
  • Costs include cleaning, maintenance, and furnishing replacements.
  • High turnover increases wear and tear.

Hotels:

  • Professional management teams oversee daily operations.
  • Economies of scale reduce per-room operating costs.
  • Technology (PMS, RMS, AI chatbots) streamlines operations and reduces labor expenses.

Investor Takeaway: STRs require intensive oversight for small portfolios, while hotels offer scalability with professional management. Learn how hotel investing delivers passive income.

5. Regulatory and Legal Risks

Short-Term Rentals:

  • Many cities have imposed restrictions on STRs due to housing shortages.
  • Licensing, zoning laws, and tax compliance add layers of risk.
  • Regulatory uncertainty can dramatically cut profitability.

Hotels:

  • Operate within well-defined legal frameworks.
  • Zoning, licensing, and compliance are standardized.
  • Safer long-term play with less regulatory volatility.

Investor Takeaway: Hotels provide more predictable compliance, while STRs face growing legal scrutiny.

6. Scalability for Investors

Short-Term Rentals:

  • Scaling requires acquiring multiple individual units across different locations.
  • Management complexity grows with each property.
  • Difficult to achieve institutional-level efficiency.

Hotels:

  • A single acquisition provides dozens or even hundreds of revenue-generating rooms.
  • Easier to scale with professional operators and brand affiliations.
  • Institutional investors prefer hotels for their scalable infrastructure.

Investor Takeaway: For investors seeking scale, hotels are the more efficient choice.

7. Risk Management and Stability

Short-Term Rentals:

  • Highly vulnerable to market shifts (e.g., travel restrictions, recessions).
  • Dependent on tourism demand in niche areas.
  • Limited diversification within a single property.

Hotels:

  • Recession-resistant to some extent essential travel, business, and group events sustain demand.
  • Branded hotels enjoy strong loyalty programs and diversified booking channels.
  • Better equipped to weather economic downturns.

Investor Takeaway: Hotels deliver stronger risk-adjusted returns, aligning with investors focused on capital preservation. Read: Is Hotel Investing Recession-Resistant?.

8. Guest Experience and Loyalty

Short-Term Rentals:

  • Experience varies by host, leading to inconsistent reviews.
  • Lack of standardized service can hurt repeat business.
  • Limited loyalty programs.

Hotels:

  • Provide reliable service, amenities, and professional hospitality.
  • Major chains run loyalty programs like Marriott Bonvoy or Hilton Honors.
  • Consistency drives repeat bookings.

     

Investor Takeaway: Hotels offer stronger long-term loyalty and brand-driven repeat customers.

9. Technology’s Role in Performance

Hotels are rapidly adopting technology to improve both efficiency and guest experience:

  • Revenue Management Systems (RMS): Dynamic pricing boosts occupancy and ADR.
  • Mobile Check-In & Smart Keys: Improve convenience and reduce labor costs.
  • Smart Rooms: IoT devices lower energy costs and enhance guest satisfaction.

While STRs benefit from platform exposure (via Airbnb algorithms), hotels have far greater opportunities to integrate advanced technology for long-term profitability. See our blog on Technology in Boosting Hotel Profitability.

10. Investment Liquidity and Exit Strategies

Short-Term Rentals:

  • Liquidity is tied to individual property markets.
  • Buyers may not value STR revenue potential due to uncertainty.
  • Difficult to sell as an “operating business” at scale.

Hotels:

  • Institutional investors actively buy and sell hotel assets.
  • Clear valuation metrics (RevPAR, ADR, NOI).
  • Easier to package in syndications or portfolio sales.

Investor Takeaway: Hotels provide more defined exit strategies and institutional-grade liquidity.

Ready to invest in recession-resistant hospitality assets?

Discover how Qila Capital helps investors achieve stable, scalable returns through professionally managed hotel investments.
Click Here

Conclusion

While short-term rentals have disrupted the hospitality industry and created opportunities for small-scale investors, they come with volatility, regulatory risk, and limited scalability. Hotels, on the other hand, remain a resilient and proven investment class. They provide consistent cash flow, professional management, brand loyalty, and scalable growth opportunities.

For investors seeking long-term stability, capital preservation, and reliable returns, hotels remain a stronger investment option. At Qila Capital, our strategy focuses on repositioning underperforming hotels, integrating technology, and capturing untapped guest segments to deliver superior returns.

Recent Posts

Get In Touch

Speak to us